Hi guys,
Keep an eye on this part of the blog. I'll be adding important terms and ideas to this throughout the semester. Because it will be continuously updated, it will not appear as a new post at the top of the page, you will have to scroll down to view it.
Biomedical model: (5 assumptions)
1) The mind and the body can be treated separately. *We seek biological explanations for mind abnormalities (depression)
2) The body can be repaired like a machine. *This is a very impersonal approach to the healing process. This does not address the psychological or emotional effects that the disease or injury my illicit.
3) The merits of technological interventions are sometimes overplayed. *The idea that to improve healthcare, we need more technology. This is imbedded in the capitalist consumer attitude that lavish and more expensive procedures and advances are more beneficial.
4) Biomedicine is reductionist in that explanations of disease focus on biological changes to the relative neglect of social and psychological factors. *We tend to focus on the physical presence of the secular disease and deny the social factors that allow that disease to thrive.
5) Germ theory…assumes that every disease is caused by a specific, identifiable agent (disease) *This does not look at diseases not caused by a specific agent. Think of heart disease and it’s relation to stress and diet. (obesity).
Social Constructionism: Knowledge and history are based on a socially created present. The views that we generally accept as truth are skewed by the value margins that our culturally contextual society puts on it.
Discourse: Socially constructed meaning through symbolic communication.
Epistemology: the study of knowledge and justified belief.
Radical Constructionists: don’t suppose the existence of an external reality. We have created a discourse for understanding ourselves not through self-legitimizing truth but by the means through which we may describe ourselves. The techniques that we use and the terminology to describe are socially created.
Realism: presume the existence of an external reality, but argue that there are various competing accounts of that reality. There are innate truths but the process by which we use to describe it creates a cultural socket to which we affix present meaning.
Ideology: an organized system of ideas and beliefs. Ideology circulates as the natural order of things. Ideologies serve the interests of specific social groups at the expense of others.
Ethnocentrism: the belief that one's culture’s way of doing something is the best way.
Whig History: looks at the historical benefits to self-legitimize current action. This trys to establish medicine as a "natural progression."
Hegemony: A prevalent cultural dynamic that seems natural but is actually a social construction
Stratification: A social separation (hierarchy) based on class, gender, race, SES, etc
Social Institutions: Those groups surrounding an individual which illicit action to facilitate the self-propagating interests of an institution. These groups are embeded in and formed as a result of social structure. These can be either formal (school) or informal (family) which governs the
Normative Behavior : The latent rules set forth by dominant institutions that governs the ways in which an individual fulfills their social role.
Culture: A way of life for an entire society. This includes norms of behavior, systems of belief, socialization, dress and food.
Social Epidemiology: The prevalence of morbidity and mortality rates amongst different social groups. It is also a study of the social factors that contribute to differences in health among groups.
Morbidity: the rate of sickness
Mortality: the rate of death
Reformist: Interested in the individual (micro-level) and their interaction with their environment. This can be factors such as pollution, lifestyle, income and nutrition.
Materialist: This is a look at outside (macro-level) influences that shape society such as class relations.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
hi. I was just creating my account and wanted to check to see if this thing works. Well it does, but i have one question what is SES socio-economical standings (I probably made that word up) or something along those lines?
ReplyDeleteHi Amanda,
ReplyDelete"SES" is socio-economic status. Its a term to describe the relative status of a group of people in terms of money. We'll be talking in class about how this relates to many different aspects of health.
Thanks for the question.
-Tyler
Hey. As i was working on making the fictional biography the other day i noticed that it asked us to give their social status and social class. Is there a difference between the two? I didn't get a chance to ask during class.
ReplyDelete-Rachel
rachel, good question.
ReplyDeleteSocial class usually refers to economic standing, at least in the US (it's a little different in the UK, for example). Social status is usually highly correlated with social class.. but there are exceptions. For example, it is usually the case the rich people are of higher social status. IN other words, their occupation, standing in society, etc., is viewed more positively because of their wealth. However, it is possible to have a very professional, high status occupation whilst not being in the highest tax bracket. For instance, some medical doctors in less paid areas, professors (who have usually attended elite universities, etc),...
Hope this makes sense!?A
In our society, it appears as if money and status is what creates the ability to define what is scientifically accurate. Pharmaceutical companies are among the highest social status, and they have great power. Theses companies create diseases every day. It's almost as if they pick a typical emotion and create a prescription that will prevent that emotion. Soon people who are experiencing extreme happiness will be prescribed drugs.
ReplyDeleteThe power that pharmaceutical companies have over our society is unthinkable. These companies are able to buy their support from the government who in turn is in-control of the media. As a result, all of us who watch the television are affected by "truths or diagnosis's" the socially strong throw down the pyramid. We of the rather weak social stature believe what is pitched to us. As a society we are taught to believe that the government and medicine will help us, but does it? There is no natural progression of medicine. It is just a progression of power for the pharmaceutical companies. Its come to the point where they've begun to vaccinate infants for chicken pox. The chicken pox’s are a slight itch that most people experience. They make our immune system stronger. If people continue to be over vaccinated then what will our immune system be like in the up in coming decades?
Amanda,
ReplyDeleteI think you make a lot of really interesting points, especially when it comes to the strong links between huge corporations, government sponsors (and visa versa) and the messages we are sent as a society as a result of the collaborative efforts of both parties to sculpt our thoughts and behaviors that surround illness, and proper treatment. Money is unfortunately the base of this ever weakening medical system that we have, and I think that is why it is becoming so vulnerable as the economy has remained in its recessive state.
This being said, I am very unaware of the pharm. companies producing a copious number of ailments as a result of them having drugs at hand to "cure" these invented ailments. I know in the area of psycho-pharmaceutical treatment there have been some questionable diagnoses and treatments as we have discussed in class but I am a Soc/Psych major so I would be totally unexposed to any other instances and would be really interested in learning of them...
In part because of how they most definitely relate to our society and medicine, and in part because the corporate scandal that occurs in the world without the attention of the masses is just plain amazing to me!!
Thanks for your awesome comments, and also for showing so much passion about your thoughts as they related to that particular issue. Its cool that you were so open about it and I hope it inspires others to share their areas of concern, or question as they relate to the class!